This policy explains who is responsible for Whole for Good public education, which sources we prioritize, how technology is used, and where education stops and individualized care begins.
Effective July 16, 2026 · Applies to the Whole for Good Academy and public health education
Whole for Good public content helps adults understand health topics, prepare for clinical conversations, and practice realistic self-management actions. It is not a substitute for diagnosis, emergency evaluation, prescribing, or individualized treatment.
We prioritize current regulatory agencies, public-health authorities, professional clinical guidance, systematic reviews, and original peer-reviewed research. Each Academy lesson lists the primary sources most relevant to the chapter.
Pages identify the responsible editorial team, update date, sources, and whether final clinical approval is still required. We do not label content medically reviewed by a named clinician until that review is documented.
Medication education explains questions, monitoring, safety boundaries, and regulatory distinctions. It does not determine eligibility, recommend a drug to an individual, guarantee a prescription, or replace approved prescribing information.
Technology may help organize research, structure drafts, and identify missing questions. Human editors remain responsible for source selection, limitations, safety language, publication, correction, and any clinical approval. AI does not make Whole for Good clinical decisions.
Content is reviewed when material guidance, regulation, safety information, or service capability changes. Material corrections should change the page update date and, when useful to readers, include a visible explanation.
Pages should name important limitations, avoid guaranteed outcomes, and direct readers toward urgent or emergency help when routine education is not appropriate.
Educational access should not hide pricing, guarantee treatment, or imply that purchasing care guarantees medication. Program and outside costs are disclosed separately.
Use the Whole for Good contact pathway and include the page title, URL, and the specific statement or source that needs review. Do not include private health information in a general editorial request.